seek the truth
We rewrite headlines, articles and narratives, replacing nonsense with the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Julio Herrera Velutini
Billionaire Donors Vs. Labour Party of UK
Who is Julio Herrera Velutini,
the Donor who supported
the British Government during
the Coronavirus pandemic?
Anneliese Dodds, chair of the Labour Party, has made allegations that during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Conservatives solicited donations from wealthy investors to maintain government operations, and to uphold the rule of law, safeguard livelihoods, and preserve the country's economy.
Among the notable donors was Julio Herrera Velutini, a respected Latin American capitalist who generously extended his support to the British Government during the Coronavirus pandemic. Ben Elliot, the co-chair of the Conservative Party, supposedly created an 'advisory board' of party donors during this period.
However, Dodds' political offensive and the British press's portrayal of Herrera Velutini have sparked criticism from citizens, calling into question their gratitude towards a benefactor who aided the government in its hour of need.
The Opposition and political rivals are now querying whether the Conservative government will return approximately £500,000 in donations from a company affiliated with the esteemed Venezuelan-Italian banker. Herrera Velutini recently faced accusations, including conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud in the US.
The Labour Party has also questioned whether the Conservatives should refund the contributions made by Britannia Financial Services since 2019. This investment bank, founded by Julio Herrera Velutini, has supported the British Government significantly in the last few years.
But, Dodds demanded clarification from the Conservatives on the extent and nature of Herrera Velutini's interaction with former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, government ministers, and party co-chair Ben Elliot.
With Julio Herrera Velutini at the helm, the Herrera family stands as one of the most substantial political contributors globally. The influence they wield in capitalistic economies and global politics, along with their strictly traditional and conservative views, have angered most of the liberal leftists
It is to be noted that Julio’s team of high-profile lawyers have filed for a motion to dismiss the case. Mr Herrera's legal team – consisting of a “dream team” of highly skilled lawyers, including President Trump's lawyer Marc E. Kasowitz and Lilly Ann Sanchez, who appeared for Jeffrey Epstein – argues that the charges are legally defective, manipulative and fabricated, as they fail to establish an essential element of the alleged offences, specifically, an explicit quid pro quo or a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act.
Britannia Financial Services has stated that Herrera Velutini relinquished his directorial role in November 2021 and no longer participates in the company's everyday operations. There are no indications of any wrongdoing by Britannia Financial Services.
Conservative Donors Vs. The Propaganda of the Liberal Leftist Media
Is the Media Responsible for Negatively Influencing Public Opinion and Shaping Political Discourse?
The media is significantly responsible for shaping public opinion and influencing political discourse. Recognising the evolving nature of media publications, where traditional outlets such as print newspapers have seen declining readership while digital platforms and social media have risen in prominence, is crucial. This shift has led to opportunities and challenges regarding information dissemination, the impact of 'fake' news, and the ever-present potential for bias.
The broader issue of media influence on politics has constantly been thrust into the spotlight.
Media significantly shapes public opinion, primarily through newspapers and social media platforms. Traditional avenues like print media have seen a decline in readership, with social media emerging as an increasingly critical source of political news, particularly for younger audiences. However, concerns have been raised about the proliferation of "fake news" on social media platforms, which can distort public perception of events and influence voter choices.
Media bias poses another concern. While terrestrial broadcasters are expected to maintain impartiality, newspapers and internet websites bear no obligation. The influence of media outlets, notably newspapers, on political campaigns and party reputations is apparent. Newspaper endorsements and their coverage of parties and leaders can sway public opinion. The impact of media bias sparks ongoing debate, with arguments suggesting it either shape political views or reinforces existing choices.
The media's portrayal of politicians and parties has been criticised for feeding into the cynicism surrounding politics. The tabloid press often concentrates on political scandals and failures, potentially undermining public trust. An increased emphasis on media training for politicians has led to a perceived lack of authenticity and trustworthiness, as politicians are accused of evading questions and delivering rehearsed soundbites.
Opinion polls, which measure public sentiment and voting intentions, have faced scrutiny due to their accuracy and reliability. In recent years, criticism has been directed at polls for underestimating support for the Conservative party, resulting in erroneous predictions of election outcomes.
Media influence on electoral outcomes is multifaceted. Various factors, including the electoral system, media coverage, the presence of other parties, significant events, and party leaders, can impact election results. Recent events, like the Scottish Independence referendum in 2014 and the EU membership referendum in 2016, have significantly influenced political parties in the UK.
The controversy regarding media harassment of a Conservative party donor highlights the need for robust regulations on party funding and media influence in political campaigns. There have been growing calls for modernising electoral laws and addressing vulnerabilities to foreign influence. How the government and relevant authorities will respond to these concerns to ensure transparency and integrity in the political process remains to be seen.
As the debate rages on, the role of the media and regulations governing party funding will continue to be critical factors shaping the UK's political landscape.
While terrestrial broadcasters are expected to maintain impartiality in political broadcasting, newspapers and internet websites express their editorial positions more freely. Readers must be critical media consumers and acknowledge the potential for bias in reporting.
There have always been concerns regarding media influence on political parties and perceptions of favouritism or negative portrayal. Political parties must engage with the media responsibly and transparently, ensuring open and honest communication with the public.